Why Samsung is now trying to outsmart Apple in the iPhone battery battle

Samsung’s newest battery is more powerful than any iPhone battery before it.

That means the iPhone’s newest device can’t match the performance of Samsung’s new flagship battery.

What you need to know about the new iPhone battery article Apple’s iPhone battery has had a tough few years.

A battery that’s more powerful has helped the company’s smartphone devices keep up with the latest iPhones and iPads.

Now, however, that power has been used up by the iPhone.

Apple is using more energy than ever before.

The iPhone 7 Plus and iPhone 7 have had more energy consumption than previous generations of the iPhone, but the battery has struggled to keep up.

It can’t keep up, so Apple has taken matters into its own hands and created its own battery.

Its battery is made up of 18 percent lithium ion, 20 percent magnesium, and 20 percent carbon, all of which are more efficient than the lithium ion batteries in the Galaxy S8 and Galaxy S9.

But it’s still not enough.

The battery has to store enough energy to power a smartphone’s screen, which in turn can power its camera, microphone, and other features.

The next iPhone, expected to be released in late 2019, will use a battery that is about 10 percent smaller than the iPhone 7’s battery, and about 20 percent lighter.

Samsung’s latest battery is bigger, and the iPhone 8 is expected to have the same size and weight.

The batteries are not nearly as efficient, so the iPhone is not a perfect replacement.

The biggest issue with the iPhone batteries is that they’re still a battery.

Apple does not use lithium ion cells in the battery, instead relying on other materials.

For instance, the iPhone has a special type of polymer that is used to make the iPhone 9, iPhone 9 Plus, and iPhone X batteries.

The polymer is a type of plastic that can be used to produce a battery, but it’s not made of lithium.

That is the reason Apple doesn’t use lithium-ion batteries in any of its devices.

But if it could produce the same batteries for cheaper and more widely available, it would be able to offer better performance and longer battery life.

The same thing could happen with Samsung’s battery.

It could replace the batteries that Samsung uses in the latest iPhone, Galaxy S10, and Galaxy Tab S9, but those batteries would still be a battery compared to the iPhone itself.

If the battery can produce a better battery, Apple could offer its products with a battery with a larger capacity, which would allow the company to offer them for more affordable prices.

It would also make the devices cheaper and faster to charge.

There is one final factor that Apple needs to address before it can move on to the next iPhone: the batteries will last for decades.

The more power the iPhone produces, the longer its batteries can last.

A 10,000mAh battery that lasts for five years could last a year, while a 20,000 mAh battery that can last up to eight years could be a problem.

This is why Apple needs a longer battery.

That’s why Samsung will use more energy in its battery than the other phone makers combined.

And if Apple were to get the iPhone into a long-lasting state, it could create a battery market that would be dominated by Samsung.